Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 18;11(7):7243–7261. doi: 10.3390/s110707243

Table 3.

Estimated lever-arm offsets and boresight angles between each camera and the IMU body frame, using different geo-referencing methods.

Method Camera Δω (deg ± s) Δϕ (deg ± s) Δκ (deg ± s) ΔX (m ± m) ΔY (m ± m) ΔZ (m ± m)
Two-step (Indirect Georef.) o)2: (0.0025)2 Camera “0” (AVT-0) −0.97284 ±535.7 −0.26904 ±4478.0 1.37450 ±5441.1 0.08 ±0.06 0.49 ±0.02 −1.57 ±0.02
Camera “1” (AVT-1) −0.03595 ±698.0 −0.62728 ±4473.9 −0.62241 ±5433.6 0.08 ±0.07 −0.98 ±0.02 −1.49 ±0.02
Camera “2” (Basler-2) −42.62160 ±600.5 −1.17411 ±5287.6 −0.21013 ±4784.4 0.09 ±0.06 −0.99 ±0.03 −0.93 ±0.02
Camera “3” (Basler-3) −89.92737 ±713.5 0.60325 ±5524.1 −0.93508 ±4580.1 0.06 ±0.04 −0.96 ±0.02 0.16 ±0.02
Camera “4” (Basler-4) −129.08182 ±805.1 −0.38674 ±4761.7 −1.40071 ±5167.7 0.04 ±0.04 −0.95 ±0.02 0.92 ±0.02

Two-step (Indirect Geo-ref. with ROC) 0)2: (0.0032) 2 Camera “0” (AVT-0) −0.96123 ±658.8 −0.27439 ±4502.9 1.38869 ±5430.5 0.07 ±0.06 0.49 ±0.02 −1.57 ±0.02
Camera “1” (AVT-1) −0.01722 ±641.3 −0.65988 ±4491.6 −0.60753 ±5440.2 0.08 ±0.07 −0.98 ±0.02 −1.49 ±0.02
Camera “2” (Basler-2) −42.61830 ±658.0 −1.22283 ±5241.0 −0.21120 ±4722.3 0.08 ±0.06 −0.99 ±0.02 −0.92 ±0.02
Camera “3” (Basler-3) −89.87900 ±766.2 0.56395 ±5439.1 −0.94801 ±4492.6 0.06 ±0.04 −0.97 ±0.02 0.17 ±0.02
Camera “4” (Basler-4) −129.07587 ±762.3 −0.37444 ±4787.0 −1.40052 ±5181.4 0.04 ±0.04 −0.95 ±0.02 0.92 ±0.02

Single-step (ISO) 0)2: (0.0077) 2 Camera “0” (AVT-0) −0.90343 ±454.4 0.05174 ±125.7 1.28972 ±119.1 0.07 ±0.12 0.50 ±0.10 −1.55 ±0.10
Camera “1” (AVT-1) 0.06634 ±454.7 −0.31522 ±125.1 −0.70938 ±120.3 0.08 ±0.12 −0.98 ±0.10 −1.48 ±0.10
Camera “2” (Basler-2) −42.53492 ±454.7 −0.92732 ±128.6 0.00765 ±119.3 0.08 ±0.12 −0.99 ±0.10 −0.92 ±0.10
Camera “3” (Basler-3) −89.83526 ±455.9 0.55968 ±131.7 −0.53241 ±117.4 0.06 ±0.12 −0.96 ±0.10 0.17 ±0.10
Camera “4” (Basler-4) −129.0088 ±456.0 −0.64709 ±129.3 −1.07301 ±119.4 0.05 ±0.12 −0.94 ±0.10 0.93 ±0.10