Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 18;6:59. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-59

Table 3.

Comparison of Uncemented and Cemented Groups, intra-operative fracture incidence and outcomes according to the Vancouver Classification

Study Groups Uncemented Cemented
Intra-operative periprosthetic fracture
(n = 62, 15.2%) P < 0.001*
No fracture Intra-operative periprosthetic fracture
(n = 9, 5.9%)
No fracture
Vancouver Classification AG AL B1 B2 - AG AL B1 -
Total Number 3 33 16 10 345 3 4 2 144

Outcome Dislocation 1 - - - 2 - - - 1
Subsided & Girdlestone - 1 - - 2 - - - -
Subsided & healed - 9 - - - - - - -
AO Cable - 22 16 10 - - 4 2 -
Girdlestone - - 1 - 1 - - - -
Revised to THR - - - 9 - - - - 1
Revised for infection - - - - 3 - - - -
ITU admission - - - - 2 - - - -
Healed - - - - - 3 - - -

30 Day Mortality 0 3 3 0 20 (5.8%) 0 0 1 5 (3.2%)
90 Day Mortality 0 6 4 2 36 (10.3%) 0 0 1 10 (6.7%)

Revision rate in Uncemented group with intra-operative fracture is 17.7% (P < 0.001)* with Odds ratio = 12.52 (95%CI 4.42-35.30).

90 Day mortality rate in Uncemented group with intra-operative fracture is 19.7% (P < 0.03) * with Odds ratio = 2.16 (95% CI 1.03-4.34)

P < 0.05* significant findings confirm that adverse outcomes are strongly linked to the Uncemented group sustaining intra-operative fracture.