Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 22;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-8-39

Table 7.

Performance comparison of the biclustering networks.

Methods EdgeCount TP FP TN FN AUROC AUPR
Gold 2194 2194 0 400396 0 1 1

ALL 5440 94 5346 395050 2100 0.5148 0.0073

SAMBA 1611 46 1565 398831 2148 0.5085 0.0072

ISA 2558 56 2502 397894 2138 0.5097 0.0067

OPSM 220 12 208 400188 2182 0.5025 0.0067

Friedman 947 22 925 399471 2172 0.5039 0.0065

CMSBE 735 20 715 399681 2174 0.5037 0.0063

K-means 380 13 367 400029 2181 0.5025 0.0061

Bivisu 1515 13 1502 398894 2181 0.5011 0.0055

CC 590 3 587 399809 2191 0.5000 0.0054

Performances of biclustering networks are compared with the Friedman network and gold network. EdgeCount: the number of network edges; TP: number of true positive edges; TN: number of true negative edges; FP: number of false negative edges; AUROC: area under ROC curve; AUPR: area under precision recall curve.