Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 23;5:471–485. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S19045

Table 5.

Comparison of immunohistochemistry using various ALK antibodies and fluorescence in situ hybridization

Mayo study: IHC (ALK1) versus FISH study (κ = 0.55)37 (12 ALK FISH positives out of 103 NSCLC tumors screened)

IHC 3+ (n = 8) IHC 2+ (n = 4) IHC 1+ (n = 22) IHC 0 (n = 69)
ALK FISH-positive (n = 12) 8 3 1 0
ALK FISH-negative (n = 91) 0 1 21 69
Seoul National University study: IHC (5A4) versus FISH study (κ = 0.92)38 (28 ALK FISH positives out of 640 screened)

IHC 3+ (n = 16) IHC 2+ (n = 10) IHC 1+ (n = 14) IHC 0 (n = 413)

Test set (19 ALK FISH positives out of 453 tumors screened)
ALK FISH-positive (n = 19) 16 3 0 0
ALK FISH-negative (n = 434) 0 7 14 413
IHC 3+ (n = 6) IHC 2+ (n = 6) IHC 1+ (n = 2) IHC 0 (n = 173)

Validation set (9 ALK FISH out of 187 tumors screened)
ALK FISH-positive (n = 9) 6 3 0 0
ALK FISH-negative (n = 178) 0 3 2 173

Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; κ, interobserver variability; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IHC, immunohistochemistry; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.