Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 22;88(6):1158–1174. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9601-6

Table 1.

Associations between attitudes supporting peer violence and involvement in peer violence perpetration among youth after controlling for demographic characteristics, personal characteristics, family environment, and peer environment

Any peer violence perpetration
AOR (95% CI)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Attitudes supporting boys hitting boys 1.53 (1.27, 1.85) 1.52 (1.26, 1.85) 1.45 (1.19, 1.77) 1.35 (1.07, 1.72)
Attitudes supporting girls hitting girls 1.62 (1.32, 1.98) 1.55 (1.26, 1.90) 1.49 (1.21, 1.83) 1.14 (0.89, 1.48)
Male 1.18 (1.02, 1.36) 1.23 (1.06, 1.43) 1.05 (0.86, 1.28)
Grade
 7 1.33 (1.12, 1.57) 1.47 (1.23, 1.76) 0.99 (0.78, 1.25)
 9 1.60 (1.34, 1.91) 1.66 (1.38, 1.99) 1.48 (1.18, 1.86)
Race/ethnicity
 Hispanic 1.14 (0.94, 1.37) 1.00 (0.82, 1.21) 1.13 (0.89, 1.44)
 African American 1.21 (0.99, 1.49) 1.14 (0.93, 1.41) 1.35 (1.03, 1.76)
 Other 1.11 (0.78, 1.59) 0.96 (0.67, 1.38) 0.98 (0.61, 1.56)
Family composition
 1 guardian 1.01 (0.84, 1.21) 0.99 (0.79, 1.25)
 Multiple guardians 1.15 (0.96, 1.38) 0.98 (0.78, 1.24)
Child maltreatment 1.90 (1.63, 2.21) 1.31 (1.08, 1.59)
Inadequate parenting style 1.32 (1.12, 1.56) 1.05 (0.84, 1.30)
Binge drinking 1.15 (0.91, 1.46)
Illicit drug use 1.15 (0.91, 1.45)
Weapon carrying 1.92 (1.49, 2.48)
Low self-efficacy 0.81 (0.73, 0.89)
Suicide attempt 1.00 (0.73, 1.36)
Low academic grades 0.86 (0.71, 1.04)
Friends’ dating violence 1.91 (1.55, 2.37)
Peer violence victimization 8.80 (7.31, 10.58)

Reference categories are those with female, 11/12 grade, White race/ethnicity, lived with two guardians, did not experience child maltreatment, experienced average/high parenting style, did not binge drink, did not use illicit drugs, did not carry a weapon, had high self-efficacy, did not attempt suicide, had mostly A’s and B’s, did not have peers involved in dating violence perpetration, and did not experience peer violence victimization

AOR adjusted odds ratio