Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011 Sep;70(9):799–810. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31822c09bc

Table 7.

Medullary GABAA Receptor Binding Density in SIDS Cases and Controls in Stage 3.

Age-Adjusted Mean (SE)
SIDS Cases
(n=34)
Acute
Controls
(n=7)
Chronic
Controls
(n=6)
3 way
p value
Combined
Controls
(n=13)
%
Decreased
* p value
Medullary 5-HT source nuclei
Raphé obscurus 26.5 (3.4) 55.9 (7.0) 63.9 (8.5) <0.001 59.2 (5.4) 55% <0.001
Paragigantocellularis lateralis 27.9 (2.8) 48.8 (5.9) 72.2 (7.1) <0.001 58.3 (4.9) 52% <0.001
Gigantocellularis 34.5 (2.9) 60.0 (6.3) 76.2 (7.6) <0.001 66.5 (5.0 48% <0.001
Intermediate reticular 34.9 (2.9) 61.4 (6.0) 71.5 (7.3) <0.001 65.5 (4.7) 47% <0.001
Arcuate nucleus 28.7 (3.2) 33.6 (6.9) 40.2 (8.3) 0.410 36.4 (5.3) 21% 0.230
Medullary 5-HT projection nuclei
Medial accessory olive 37.6 (2.4) 53.0 (6.2) 46.2 (5.7) 0.051 49.3 (4.2) 24% 0.020
Nucleus of the solitary tract 42.4 (2.3) 80.5 (5.9) 78.3 (5.4) <0.001 79.3 (3.9) 47% <0.001
Hypoglossal nucleus 45.7 (3.2) 81.2 (8.3) 77.5 (7.6) <0.001 79.1 (5.6) 42% <0.001
Dorsal accessory olive 33.6 (3.0) 47.1 (6.4) 73.5 (7.7) <0.001 NP NP NP
Principal inferior olive 30.2 (2.3) 43.3 (5.1) 44.1 (6.1) 0.021 43.6 (3.9) 31% 0.006
*

p value, comparison of SIDS and acute and chronic combined group; NP, not performed because the binding values for the acute and chronic controls were significantly different from each other.