Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Soft Matter. 2010 Jan 1;6(11):2449–2461. doi: 10.1039/C001605E

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Characterization of the foreign body response to PLLA, PPO-MaC, and EPPOMaC implants. The response thickness was found to be larger for EPPOMaC films when compared to PLLA at all time points, but was significantly reduced by 4 weeks. The response thickness of PPOMaC implants decreased throughout the implantation period and was found to be comparable to the PLLA implants.