Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;118(6):1345–1353. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318236f4b5

Table 1.

Phenotype Characteristics of Familial Pelvic Organ Prolapse Study Participants

Characteristic Utah Cohort Dutch Cohort
Number of POP subjects 115 76
 Treated with pessary 2 (1.7%) Not available
 Treated with one surgery 78 (67.8%) 0
 Required repeat surgery 35 (30.4%) 76 (100%)
Mean ± SD age at diagnosis (range) 48.8 ± 14.2 yrs (range 21–75, n=85) 49.3 ± 12.4 yrs (range 24–86, n=67)
Mean ± SD parity 4.3 ± 2.4 (range 0–13, n=104) 2.4 ± 0.7 (range 1–4, n=76)
Mean BMI at time of phenotyping 26.6 ± 5.1 kg/m2 (range 16–47, n=105) 25.2 ± 3.5 kg/m2 (range 16.3–36.5, n=73)
Other pelvic floor disorders diagnosed in POP subjects
 Treated for stress urinary incontinence 72 (62.6%) Not available
 Treated for overactive bladder 37 (32.2%) Not available
 Presence of hernia 13 (11.3%) Not available

POP, pelvic organ prolapse; SD, standard deviation, BMI, body mass index.