Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 25;18(5):1291–1302. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0950

Table 2.

Multivariate analyses of factors associated with OS and RFS (n=396)

Variables OS RFS

Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
HBsAg (positive vs. negative) 1.51(0.98–2.33) 0.063 n.a.
Child-Pugh score (B+C vs. A) 1.17(0.91–1.51) 0.218 n.a.
GGT (U/l) (>54 vs. ≤54) 1.35(0.99–1.83) 0.059 n.a.
AFP(ng/ml) (>20 vs. ≤20) 1.49(1.08–2.07) 0.015 n.a.
Tumor encapsulation (none vs. complete) 0.78(0.58–1.05) 0.097 n.a.
Tumor size (cm) (>5 vs. ≤5) 2.08(1.21–3.55) 0.008 n.a.
Tumor number (multiple vs. single) 1.40(0.81–2.40) 0.229 2.05(1.42–2.97) 0
Vascular invasion (yes vs. no) 1.20(0.69–2.08) 0.514 1.00(0.72–1.39) 0.994
TNM stage (II+III vs. I) 1.76(0.87–3.56) 0.117 1.39(0.96–2.00) 0.078
BCLC stage (B+C vs. 0+A) 0.64(0.37–1.10) 0.103 n.a.
Ptch1 (positive vs. negative) n.a. 1.53(1.09–2.14) 0.013

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; RFS, relapse-free survival; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; Ptch1, protein patched were adopted for their prognostic significance by univariate analyses.