Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2011 Nov;12(11 Suppl):T46–T60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.08.007

Table 1.

Global Measures of Psychological Function for TMD Cases and Controls

Putative risk factor Units and potential range Controls TMD cases P-value1 Non-imputed effect estimates2
Imputed effect estimates
Site-adjusted effect3 Fully adjusted effect4 Fully adjusted effect
n mean se n mean se SOR5 95% CI6 SOR 95%CI n SOR 95%CI
SCL 90R Depression (0–4 scale) 1594 0.37 0.01 181 0.64 0.05 <0.0001 1.5 1.3, 1.7 1.6 1.4, 1.8 1807 1.6 1.4, 1.8
SCL 90R Somatization (0–4 scale) 1604 0.25 0.01 182 0.64 0.04 <0.0001 2.1 1.8, 2.4 2.1 1.8, 2.4 1807 2.1 1.8, 2.4
SCL 90R Anxiety (0–4 scale) 1608 0.19 0.01 182 0.35 0.03 <0.0001 1.4 1.2, 1.6 1.5 1.3, 1.7 1807 1.4 1.3, 1.7
SCL 90R Hostility (0–4 scale) 1617 0.27 0.01 182 0.46 0.04 <0.0001 1.4 1.2, 1.6 1.5 1.3, 1.7 1807 1.5 1.3, 1.7
EPQ-R Extraversion (0–12 scale) 1606 8.44 0.08 180 8.37 0.25 0.7642 1.0 0.8, 1.1 1.0 0.8, 1.2 1807 1.0 0.8, 1.2
EPQ-R Neuroticism (0–12 scale) 1611 4.20 0.08 180 5.60 0.26 <0.0001 1.6 1.3, 1.8 1.4 1.2, 1.7 1807 1.4 1.2, 1.7
1

P-values are from analysis variance model comparing mean values of putative risk factor between cases and controls, with adjustment for study site.

2

Non-imputed effect estimates are for complete case analysis using numbers of subjects in columns headed n.

3

Site-adjusted effects were computed in logistic regression models where the putative risk factor as the main explanatory variable and study site as covariate.

4

Fully-adjusted effects were computed in logistic regression models that additionally include covariates of age group, gender and race/ethnicity.

5

SOR is standardized odds ratio from a logistic regression model evaluating the linear effect of the risk factor that was standardized by z-score transformation

6

95% confidence interval for SOR