Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2011 Nov;12(11 Suppl):T46–T60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.08.007

Table 3.

Measures of Somatic Awareness and Coping for TMD Cases and Controls

Putative risk factor Units and potential range Controls TMD cases P-value1 Non-imputed effect estimates2
Imputed effect estimates
Site-adjusted effect3 Fully adjusted effect4 Fully adjusted effect
n mean se n mean se SOR5 95% CI6 SOR 95%CI n SOR 95%CI
Pill Global Score (1–270 scale) 1542 88.25 0.55 171 114.09 2.37 <0.0001 2.5 2.2, 3.0 2.5 2.1, 2.9 1810 2.4 2.0, 2.8
Kohn Global Score (24–120) 1567 71.34 0.30 177 75.20 0.89 <0.0001 1.4 1.2, 1.7 1.3 1.1, 1.5 1807 1.3 1.1, 1.5
PCS Helplessness (0–24 scale) 1617 3.47 0.10 183 5.61 0.37 <0.0001 1.6 1.4, 1.8 1.5 1.3, 1.8 1811 1.5 1.3, 1.8
PCS Magnification (0–12 scale) 1624 1.89 0.05 182 2.84 0.19 <0.0001 1.5 1.3, 1.7 1.5 1.3, 1.7 1811 1.5 1.3, 1.7
PCS Rumination (0–16 scale) 1624 4.15 0.10 184 5.67 0.32 <0.0001 1.5 1.3, 1.7 1.4 1.2, 1.7 1811 1.4 1.2, 1.7
CSQ Coping Statements (0–6 scale) 1616 3.57 0.04 182 3.58 0.10 0.9469 1.0 0.9, 1.2 1.0 0.9, 1.2 1812 1.1 0.9, 1.2
CSQ Reinterpreting Pain (0–6 scale) 1618 1.23 0.03 183 1.06 0.10 0.0991 0.9 0.7, 1.0 1.0 0.8, 1.2 1812 1.0 0.8, 1.2
CSQ Distraction (0–6 scale) 1618 2.42 0.04 181 2.06 0.11 0.0018 0.8 0.7, 0.9 0.8 0.7, 1.0 1812 0.8 0.7, 1.0
CSQ Ignoring Pain (0–6 scale) 1610 2.62 0.04 182 2.58 0.10 0.7154 1.0 0.8, 1.1 1.0 0.9, 1.2 1812 1.0 0.9, 1.2
CSQ Praying & Hoping (0–6 scale) 1622 2.32 0.05 182 1.86 0.14 0.0039 0.8 0.7, 0.9 0.9 0.7, 1.0 1812 0.8 0.7, 1.0
1

P-values are from analysis variance model comparing mean values of putative risk factor between cases and controls, with adjustment for study site.

2

Non-imputed effect estimates are for complete case analysis using numbers of subjects in columns headed n.

3

Site-adjusted effects were computed in logistic regression models where the putative risk factor as the main explanatory variable and study site as covariate.

4

Fully-adjusted effects were computed in logistic regression models that additionally include covariates of age group, gender and race/ethnicity.

5

SOR is standardized odds ratio from a logistic regression model evaluating the linear effect of the risk factor that was standardized by z-score transformation

6

95% confidence interval for SOR