Table 4.
Associations of 9p21 SNPs with tanning ability in 53 melanoma families1.
|
SNP |
Tan/Little burn |
Burn/Little tan |
Model12 |
Model23 |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | |||
| IFNW1 | ||||||||||||
| rs10964862 | ||||||||||||
| TT | 100 | 38.5 | 118 | 50.4 | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| TG | 129 | 49.6 | 97 | 41.5 | 0.59 | 0.38 | 0.92 | 0.02 | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.94 | 0.03 |
| GG | 31 | 11.9 | 19 | 8.1 | 0.35 | 0.16 | 0.78 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.14 | 0.74 | 0.007 |
| P trend | 0.003 | 0.002 | ||||||||||
| TUSC1 | ||||||||||||
| rs13290968 | ||||||||||||
| GG | 180 | 78.6 | 133 | 64.3 | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| GC+CC | 49 | 21.4 | 74 | 35.7 | 2.31 | 1.38 | 3.89 | 0.002 | 2.25 | 1.31 | 3.84 | 0.003 |
| P trend | 0.0006 | 0.002 | ||||||||||
ORs and P values are obtained from likelihood ratio test in conditional logistic regression with tanning ability (comparing burn/little tan to tan/little burn) as the outcome variable.
Model 1: age, gender, CMM, and CDKN2A adjustment.
Model 2: age, gender, CDKN2A, CMM, number of nevi, solar injury, and MC1R adjustment.