Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 11;15(7):1093–1102. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0004-9

Table 1.

Background and outcome factors

Variable All subjects (%) No paina (%) Recurrent painb (%) Continuous painc (%) P-value Non-respondents (%)
a v. b + c n p-valued
Number of subjectse (%) 464 (100.0) 264 (56.9) 168 (36.2) 32 (6.9) 175 (100.0)
Educational level, n (%) (Q1) n=463 n=264 n=167 n=32 n=175
 Up to university level 245 (52.9) 142 (53.8) 87 (52.1) 16 (50.0) 0.665 115 (65.7) 0.004
 University education 218 (47.1) 122 (46.2) 80 (47.9) 16 (50.0) 60 (34.3)
Mean age at delivery, years (Q1) 30.2 29.6 30.8 31.8 0.001 29.6 0.168
Mean age at Q2, yrs 30.7 30.1 31.3 32.3 0.002
Time of responsef, months 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.2 0.075
Parity, mean n (Q1) 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.8 0.181 2.2 0.001
No. of pregnancies (Q1) n=456
2.4
n=259
2.3
n=166
2.5
n=31
2.2
0.128 n=170
2.8
0.001
Gestational age, days (Q1) n=464
278.1
n=264
277.9
n=168
278.0
n=32
279.9
0.762 n=174
276.6
0.233
Birth weight, g (Q1) 3 597 3 567 3 663 3 497 0.256 3 511 0.134
Mode of delivery (Q1), n (%)
 Vaginal delivery 342 (73.5) 201 (76.1) 120 (71.4) 20 (62.5) 0.010 120 (68.6) 0.540
 Vacuum extraction 34 (7.3) 17 (6.3) 13 (7.7) 4 (12.5) 12 (6.9)
 Elective CS 44 (9.5) 15 (5.7) 23 (13.7) 6 (18.8) 21 (12.0)
 Emergency CS 42 (9.0) 28 (9.6) 12 (6.2) 2 (6.2) 22 (12.6)
 Forceps 3 (0.6) 3 (1.1)
Total experience of deliveryg (Q1) n=453
7.9
n=258
7.9
n=164
8.0
n=31
7.6
0.786 n=171
7.8
0.742
Total experience of deliveryg (Q2) n=458
7.7
n=258
7.7
n=168
7.8
n=32
7.4
0.843
Pearson’s correlation coefficient of Q1 and Q2 r2=0.743 r2=0.798 r2=0.607 r2=0.872
Hyper-mobilityh (Q1) n=458 n=261 n=166 n=31 n=170
 Yes 83 (18.1) 41 (15.7) 33 (19.9) 9 (29.0) 0.123 38 (22.4) 0.232
  No 375 (81.9) 220 (84.3) 133 (80.1) 22 (71.0) 132 (77.6)
Hyper-mobilityi (Q1) n=458 n=261 n=166 n=31 n=170
  Yes 111 (24.2) 54 (20.7) 46 (27.7) 11 (35.5) 0.042 47 (27.6) 0.381
  No 347 (75.8) 207 (79.3) 120 (72.3) 20 (64.5) 123 (72.4)

Difference between groups analyzed by t-test for parametric data and Pearson’s chi-squared test for categorical data, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient where applicable

LBPP low back pain and pelvic pain; Q1 first questionnaire; Q2 second questionnaire

a‘No pain’ denotes respondents reporting remission of LBPP after pregnancy

b‘Recurrent pain’ denotes respondents reporting recurrent LBPP after pregnancy

c‘Continuous pain’ denotes respondents reporting continuous LBPP after pregnancy

dStatistical testing non-respondents versus respondents in last column

eNumber of subjects: total subject number and number for each subject category, which is also the number for each variable unless otherwise indicated (in italics)

fTime of response: mean number of months, i.e., the time from delivery until the date given in the Q2 or the date of reception of the Q2

gTotal experience of delivery scored on a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale with possible scores of 0-10, where 0 denotes ‘very bad’ and 10 denotes ‘very good’

hHyper-mobility = women reported diagnosed as having hyper-mobility

iHyper-mobility = women reported diagnosed as having hyper-mobility and/or a perception of hyper-mobility