Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 6;18(5):630–653. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0879-3

Table 10.

Clinical outcome following treatment of subaxial injuries assessed with the NDPI, the CSOQ, and the SF-36 component summary scores

Study FU (mo) N NPDI (%) CSOQ SF-36
Composite neck pain severity score Composite shoulder/arm pain severity score Functional disability score Psychological distress score Physical symptoms score Healthcare utilization score Physical component summary score Mental component summary score
Current, ACDFP 62 26 12.4 ± 12.7 (0–40) 15.6 ± 14.0 (0–40) 15.0 ± 13.5 (0–33.3) 8.1 ± 12.2 (0–28.6) 19.0 ± 17.8 (0–50) 26.6 ± 21.5 (0–66.7) 9.2 ± 15.2 (0–40) 47.0 ± 9.8 (18.2–59.3) 52.2 ± 12.4 (14.6–75.3)
Fisher [33] HTV 24 30 20.7 ± 17.7 25.8 ± 18.7 19.1 ± 24.1 30.1 ± 20.5 33.6 ± 22.6 43.6 ± 9.5 52.4 ± 9.3
Fisher [30, 33, 80] ACP 24 23.8 ± 23.5 21.5 ± 23.1 28.2 ± 23.9 32.9 ± 24.1 45.1 ± 20.9 32.6 ± 13.3 53.3 ± 14.3
Kandiziora [56] Cagea 24 52 20
Kandiziora [56] ICGa 24 19
Kwon [64] ACDFPb 12 20 46.8 ± 3.1 52.3 ± 2.2
Kwon [64] Posterior instrumented fusionb 12 22 46.9 ± 2.0 49.3 ± 2.3

Comparison to literature

HTV Halo thoracic vest, 67% w/neurology; ACP anterior corpectomy and plating, 95% w/neurology; ICG iliac crest autograft

aACDFP for both groups

bWith anterior and posterior treatment the NASS cervical spine questionnaire was 85.8 ± 8 and 81.7 ± 3.5 for pain scores, respectively