Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 6;18(5):630–653. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0879-3

Table 8.

Results of the assessment of adjacent-segment degeneration according to the classification of Kellgren [19]

Second cephalad level First cephalad level First caudal levela Second caudal levelb
Injury 0.19 ± 0.63 (0–3) 0.65 ± 0.98 (0–3) 0.67 ± 1.1 (0–4) 1.15 ± 1.4 (0–4)
Follow-up 0.23 ± 0.65 (0–4) 1.46 ± 1.42 (0–4) 1.22 ± 1.31 (0–4) 1.17 ± 1.75 (0–4)
Progression 0.04 ± 0.2 (0–1) 0.81 ± 0.85 (0–3) 0.61 ± 0.72 (0–2) 0.27 ± 0.65 (0–2)

a7.7 and 11.5% of fusions did not have a cervical first adjacent-caudal level and could not be assessed on injury or follow-up radiographs, respectively

b15.4 and 53.8% of fusions did not have second adjacent-caudal levels and could not be assessed on injury or follow-up radiographs, respectively