Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2271–2277. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00922

TABLE IV.

Comparison of Patient Data Between Patients with Combined Spinal Cord and Brachial Plexus Injuries and Patients with Isolated Brachial Plexus Injuries*

Patients with BPI and SCI(N = 31) Patients with BPI Alone (N = 224) Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value Adjusted P Value
Years of age (mean and standard deviation) 33.6 ± 11.9 32.7 ± 13.5 0.9 (–4.1, 6.0) 0.43 0.67
Mechanism of injury (no. [%])
 High-speed 23 (74.2%) 154 (69.5%)#
 Low-speed 5 (16.1%) 31 (13.9%)#
 Work-related 2 (6.5%) 5 (2.2%)#
 Football 0 (0%) 5 (2.2%)#
 Skiing 1 (3.2%) 3 (1.3%)#
 Other 0 (0%) 25 (11.2%)#
Spinal fractures 2.60 (1.21, 5.57) 0.01 0.05
 Yes 17 (54.8%) 71 (31.8%)#
 No 14 (45.2%) 152 (68.2%)#
Level of spinal fracture§(no. [%])
 Cervical 15 (48.4%) 48 (21.4%) 3.44 (1.59, 7.45) 0.001 0.01
 Thoracic 5 (16.1%) 29 (12.9%) 1.29 (0.46, 3.63) 0.58 0.74
 Lumbar 3 (9.7%) 9 (4%) 2.56 (0.65, 10.02) 0.17 0.29
Type of brachial plexus lesion (no. [%]) 0.83 (0.35, 1.96) 0.67 0.74
 Complete 23 (74.2%) 70.5% (158)
 Incomplete 8 (25.8%) 29.5% (66)
Vascular Injury (no. [%]) 0.83 (0.27, 2.52) >0.99 >0.99
 Yes 4 (12.9%) 34 (15.2%)
 No 27 (87.1%) 190 (84.8%)
Level of vascular injury (no. [%]) 22.5 (1.9, 271.9) 0.02 0.05
 Supraclavicular 3 (75%) 4 (11.8%)
 Infraclavicular 1 (25%) 30 (88.2%)
Horner sign (no. [%]) 21 (67.7%) 88 (39.5%) 3.22 (1.45, 7.17) 0.01 0.05
Phrenic nerve dysfunction (no. [%]) 9 (29%) 32 (14.3%) 2.45 (1.04, 5.81) 0.04 0.09
Number of pseudomeningoceles 2.3 ± 1.53 1.7 ± 1.37 0.7 (0.0, 1.3) 0.04 0.09
Preoperative DASH score (mean and standard deviation) 46.0 ± 18.40 45.2 ± 16.87 0.8 (–6.9, 8.5) 0.69 0.74
Preoperative VAS (mean and standard deviation) 5.4 ± 2.68 3.7 ± 3.05 1.7 (0.2, 3.3) 0.02 0.06
*

BPI = brachial plexus injury; SCI = spinal cord injury; CI = confidence interval; DASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; VAS = visual analog scale.

Dagger indicates the difference in means (95% confidence interval).

The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was applied to the p values to control the false-discovery rate.

§

Level of spinal fracture was not mutually exclusive; 20 patients had multiple-level involvement.

#

Based on denominator of 223 patients, as results were unknown in one patient.