Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Sep-Oct;22(5):505–513. doi: 10.1177/1545968308317531

Table 2.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Measures of the Contralesional Side in the 2 Treatment Groupsa

Experimental Control
rMT 1 52.06 ± 3.16 47.38 ± 3.48
rMT 2 51.31 ± 2.69 47.23 ± 3.41
rMT 3 52.44 ± 2.52 49.10 ± 4.46
aMT 1 45.28 ± 3.72 36.69 ± 3.23
aMT 2 42.00 ± 2.90 37.69 ± 3.20
aMT 3 45.69 ± 3.02 36.11 ± 3.04
Motor map area 1 (cm2) 4.87 ± 0.42 4.39 ± 0.43
Motor map area 2 (cm2) 5.42 ± 0.54 5.49 ± 0.71
Motor map area 3 (cm2) 4.62 ± 0.63 4.83 ± 0.97
COGx 1 4.70 ± 0.27 4.37 ± 0.22
COGx 2 4.58 ± 0.24 4.16 ± 0.31
COGx 3 4.65 ± 0.28 3.87 ± 0.34
COGy 1 2.76 ± 0.57 3.43 ± 0.46
COGy 2 2.95 ± 0.57 3.44 ± 0.40
COGy 3 2.62 ± 0.54 3.37 ± 0.64
a

Resting motor threshold (rMT), active motor threshold (aMT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor map area, and centers of gravity for the x-coordinate (COGx) and y-coordinate (COGy) collected in the extensor digitorum communis muscle of the less-affected forearm at baseline (1), after 2 weeks (2), and at 4-month follow-up (3). Data are expressed as mean ± standard error.