Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 1;1(3):130–135. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18512

Table 2.

Head-to-head comparison of water vs. air method in screening colonoscopy patients

Air (n=191) Water (n=177) p*
Age (years) 59.3±0.5 60.0±0.5 n.s.
Gender (male/female) 184/7 171/6 n.s.
BMI 29.9±0.4 30.1±0.4 n.s.
Current smokers 68 of 191 (35.6%) 44 of 174 (25.3%) 0.03
Proportion of current smokers with adenomas 33 of 68 (48.5%) 24 of 44 (54.5%) 0.56
Current 3occasional alcohol drinkers 73 of 191 (38.2%) 78 of 177 (44.1%) 0.289
Proportion of current 3occasional alcohol drinkers with adenomas 34 of 73 (46.6%) 45 of 78 (57.7%) 0.19
ITT cecal intubation 100% 92% n.s.
Final cecal intubation 100% 99.4% n.s.
Time to cecum (min) 5.3±0.3 6.9±0.3 <0.0001
Withdrawal time (min) 13.7±0.5 12.9±0.4 n.s.
Total time (min) 18.9±0.6 19.9±0.5 n.s.
External pressure; n (%) 54 (28.3%) 21 (11.9 %) <0.0001
Change in position 22 (11.5 %) 14 (7.9 %) n.s.
Fair-adequate or fair-compromised prep 41 (21.5%) 28 (15.8%) n.s.
Good or Excellent prep 150 (78.5%) 149 (84.2%) n.s.
Fair-adequate or fair-compromised tolerance 14 (7.3%) 12 (6.8%) n.s.
Good or Excellent tolerance 177 (92.7%) 165 (93.2%) n.s.
Fentanyl dose (mg) 76.5±1.7 68.8±1.4 0.0006
Midazolam dose (mg) 3.1±0.1 2.8±0.1 0.0007
Added sedation 52 (27.2%) 31 (17.5%) 0.03

Data are mean ± SEM and frequency count (%).

*

Student's t test or Fisher's exact test.