Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 1;1(3):130–135. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18512

Table 3.

Adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced neoplasia (AN) and anatomical distribution (proximal = proximal to splenic flexure; distal = splenic flexure and below)

Air Method (n=191) Water Method (n=177) p*
Screening 100% 100%
Total number polyps 364 375
Polyps/patient 1.9±0.2 2.1±0.2 n.s.
Total number adenomas 213 211
Adenomas/patient 1.1±0.1 1.2±0.1
Number of proximal adenomas 134 (62.9%) 142 (67.3%) n.s.
Number of distal adenomas 79 (37.1%) 69(32.7 %) n.s.
Patients with AN, n (%) 39 (20%) 27 (15.3%) n.s.
Patients with ≥ 3 adenomas (without AN features) 7 (3.6%) 10 (5.6%) n.s.
Patients with cancer 4 (1 Proximal) 1 (Proximal)
Adenoma detection rate; n (%) 88 (46.1%) 101 (57.1%) 0.04
At least one proximal adenoma; n (%) 66 (34.6%) 81 (45.8%) 0.03
<10 mm 60 (31.4%) 74 (41.8%) 0.04
≥10 mm 19 (9.9%) 15 (8.5%) n.s.
At least 1 distal adenoma; n (%) 54 (28.3%) 52 (29.4%) n.s.
<10 mm 35 (18.3%) 41 (23.2%) n.s.
≥10 mm 31 (16.2%) 18 (10.2%) n.s.

AN, advanced neoplasm. Data are mean ± SEM and frequency count (%).

*

Student's t test or Fisher's exact test.