Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 5;82(2):187–192. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566144

Table 4.

Clinical evaluation at follow-up

All patients
(n = 42)
Mean (SD)
Intact group
(n = 29)
Mean (SD)
Defect group
(n = 13)
Mean (SD)
Mean difference
(95% CI)
[Intact – Defect]
Age-adjusted mean difference
(95% CI)
[Intact – Defect]
p-value a
Constant-Murley score
 repaired shoulder 67 (22) 73 (21) 55 (20) 17 (3 to 31) 16 (1 to 31) 0.04
 contra- lateral shoulder 83 (18) 87 (14) 73 (22) 14 (0.2 to 28) 10 (–1 to 21) 0.07
WORC (%) b 75 (22) 79 (20) 65 (23) 14 (–2 to 30) 16 (1 to 32) 0.04
DASH b 22 (21) 17 (21) 31 (19) –14 (–28 to 0.4) –15 (–30 to 0.1) 0.05

a ANCOVA with age as a covariate, comparing patients with no cuff defect (intact group) and patients with cuff defect (defect group, including partial- and full-thickness tears).

b Missing values (n = 2).