Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 8;82(3):365–371. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566142

Table 3.

Comparison of the use of surgery and radiotherapy (RT) as primary treatment of spinal metastatic disease in 903 patients a

n Primary surgery Primary RT p-value OR (95% CI)
Primary cancer diagnosis 0.006
 Myeloma and Lymphoma 79 19 60 1
 Breast 152 3 149 0.1 0.3 (0.1–1.5)
 Prostate 260 11 249 0.008 0.2 (0.1–0.7)
 Lung 179 7 172 < 0.001 0.1 (0.04–0.7)
 Kidney 40 3 37 0.1 0.3 (0.07–1.4)
 Other 193 15 178 0.003 0.2 (0.1–0.6)
Age 0.4
 70+ 433 26 40 1
 50–69 400 25 375 0.2 1.6 (0.8–3.2)
 19–49 70 7 63 0.4 1.7 (0.5–6.0)
Gender 0.03
 Female 361 16 345 1
 Male 542 42 500 0.03 2.5 (1.1–5.7)
Time from primary cancer diagnosis to treatment for SM b 0.6
 Within one year 396 40 356 1
 Between one and 5 years 279 11 268 0.2 0.6 (0.3–1.3)
 6 years or more 204 5 199 0.08 0.4 (0.1–1.1)
Motor impairment c < 0.001
 Normal motor status (Frankel E) 607 11 596 1
 Ambulating with minor motor deficit (Frankel D) 176 22 154 < 0.001 9 (4–21)
 Non-ambulatory (Frankel A–C) 98 25 73 < 0.001 21 (9–50)
Multiplicity of spine metastases < 0.001
 One vertebra affected 142 26 116 1
 Multiple vertebra 761 32 729 < 0.001 0.2 (0.1–0.4)

OR: odds ratio for choice of surgery vs. RT; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

a Multiple binary logistic regression model.

b Time from primary cancer diagnosis to treatment for SM was unknown for 24 patients.

c Motor impairment was unknown for 22 patients.