Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2011 Oct 13;13(21):5932–5935. doi: 10.1021/ol202677g

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa

graphic file with name nihms332196u2.jpg
entry solvent reoxidant additive temp (°C) 3a (%)b
1 tBuOH Cu(OAc)2 -- 80 55
2 DMSO Cu(OAc)2 -- 80 53
3 DMA Cu(OAc)2 -- 80 70
4 DMF Cu(OAc)2 -- 80 78
5 DMF CuCl2 -- 80 0
6 DMF AgOAc -- 80 43
7 DMF PhCO3tBuc -- 80 59
8 DMF Cu(OAc)2 LiBF4 80 80
9 DMF Cu(OAc)2 BiCl3 80 39
10 DMF Cu(OAc)2 CsOAc 80 77
11 DMF Cu(OAc)2 K2CO3 80 68
12 DMF Cu(OAc)2 KTFA 80 85
13 DMF Cu(OAc)2 KTFA 50 73
14 DMF Cu(OAc)2 KTFA 110 69
15 DMF Cu(OAc)2 KTFA 80 87d
a

Reaction conditions unless otherwise specified: 1 (0.2 M), 2a (2 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %), reoxidant (2 equiv), additive (1 equiv) under N2 at 80 °C in 24 h. (PMP=para-methoxyphenyl)

b

1H NMR yield vs. Ph3SiMe (1 equiv) as the internal standard.

c

1 equiv.

d

Completed in 3 h. (Detailed optimization is available in the Supporting Information.)