Table 1.
Fe-μ3Ssulfide | Fe-Sthiolate | Fe-O | Fe-N | SSAM-Fe | SSAM-μ3Ssulfide | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model A | 2.28 | 2.24 | 2.21 | |||
Model B | 2.29 | 2.28 | 1.87 | |||
Model C | 2.30 | 2.28 | 2.06 | 2.32 | ||
Model D | 2.31 | 2.24 | 2.22 | 2.34 | 3.45 | 3.78 |
X-Ray | ||||||
PFL-AE10 (2.77 Å) | (2.30) | (2.27) | (2.12) | (2.17) | (3.22) | (3.97) |
HydE16 (1.62 Å) | (2.30) | (2.29) | (2.25) | (2.33) | (3.25) | (3.90) |
These theoretical active site models represent unconstrained geometry minima. Thus the optimized parameters are compared to both high and low resolution structures of SAM bound cluster. The higher resolution of the HydE structure justifies the comparison of the bond lengths up to two decimal places.