Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 13;5(12):e1427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001427

Table 2. The five trials used to validate the outcome of the classification trees.

Country (number of subjects, prevalence of STH) Mean pre-DA FEC (EPG) k FECRT Threshold of 90% Threshold of 95%
Required Predicted Required Predicted
Brazil (n = 350, 30.6%)
A. lumbricoides 1,353 0.063 100 17 50–200 17 50–200
Hookworm 101 0.097 97.5 30 10–49 176 50–200
Cambodia (n = 1,026, 31.9%)
Hookworm 183 0.121 97.6 20 10–49 75 50–200
Cameroon (n = 1,485, 44.1% )
A. lumbricoides 2,906 0.061 99.2 12 50–200 15 50–200
T. trichiura 331 0.042 39.2 32 50–200 22 50–200
Hookworm 59 0.015 93.0 4405 >200 >5000 50–200
Ethiopia (n = 410, 61.0%)
A. lumbricoides 1,293 0.083 100 7 10–49 7 50–200
T. trichiura 110 0.065 92.4 1152 >200 1099 50–200
Hookworm 74 0.144 99.7 12 10–49 14 50–200
Tanzania (n = 509, 95.3%)
A. lumbricoides 2,697 0.264 100 3 10–49 4 50–200
T. trichiura 832 0.781 52.0 6 10–49 4 50–200
Hookworm 706 0.572 95.3 78 10–49 >5000 >200

Cases highlighted in bold indicate an agreement between the required and the predicted sample size (the required sample size fell within the sample size interval predicted). Cases highlighted in italic indicate an underestimation of the required sample size (required sample size > upper limit of the predicted sample size interval). In the remaining cases, the required sample size was overestimated (required sample size > lower limit of the predicted sample size).