Skip to main content
. 2011 May 1;21(6):628–636. doi: 10.1007/s10165-011-0460-5

Table 3.

Characterization of failure of infliximab therapy in primary nonresponders

Case no. Trough (μg/ml)a DAS28-ESR HAQ CRP (mg/dl) ESR (mm/h) Anti-CCP Abs (U/ml) IgM RF (IU/ml) SJC28 (SJC66) TJC28 (TJC68) EULAR response Reason for lack of efficacy
1 <0.1 7.2 2.63 3.8 65 907 86 13 (13) 13 (23) None Rapid clearance
2 <0.1 8.6 2.75 11.7 91 Negative Negative 22 (40) 24 (46) None Rapid clearance
3 <0.1 7.2 3.00 8.4 81 112 404 10 (17) 12 (19) None Rapid clearance
4 <0.1 6.4 2.00 4.5 47 254 Negative 9 (11) 9 (11) None Rapid clearance
5 0.38 5.8 1.25 2.0 42 151 95 7 (7) 7 (7) None Rapid clearance
6 0.5 7.5 3.00 6.5 94 770 196 13 (25) 16 (28) None Rapid clearance
7b 4.71 5.3 1.65 0.5 75 127 45 2 (15) 4 (16) Moderate Residual type
8 5.77 5.8 1.75 2.0 38 Negative 21 3 (9) 7 (16) None Residual type
9 7.11 6.1 1.50 0.5 30 464 134 9 (9) 10 (12) None Residual type

DAS28 disease activity score for 28 joints, HAQ health assessment questionnaire score, CRP C-reactive protein, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anti-CCPAbs anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, RF rheumatoid factor, SJC28 swollen joint count in 28 joints, TJC28 tender joint count in 28 joints, EULAR European League Against Rheumatism

aThe trough concentrations in case 5 and those in cases 7 and 8 were obtained immediately before the 2nd and 4th infusions of infliximab, respectively; those in the other patients were obtained immediately before the 3rd infusion. Values of the other markers were determined at the end of infliximab therapy

bCase 7 achieved a moderate response as defined by the EULAR criteria at week 14, but failed to achieve a 20% clinical improvement as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria