Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Educ Eff. 2011 Jan 1;4(2):EJ920171. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2011.555288

Table 2.

Means and Ranges of Language and Reading Measures Administered at the Pretest Time Point.

Assessment Measure n = 277* n = 256 n = 198
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 62.00 (40–94) 62.12 (40–94) 61.22 (40–94)
Peabody Individual Achievement Test 80.06 (55–113) 80.14 (55–113) 79.88 (55–113)
CTOPP Elision 3.08 (1–12) 3.08 (1–12) 3.05 (1–12)
CTOPP Blending 4.01 (1–12) 4.06 (1–12) 4.04 (1–12)
CTOPP Rapid Letter Naming 5.49 (1–12) 5.45 (1–15) 5.43 (1–15)
WJ Letter Word ID 77.03 (52–89) 77.26 (52–89) 77.61 (52–89)
WJ Word Attack 78.06 (33–98) 78.05 (33–98) 78.08 (33–98)
WJ Fluency 77.72 (58–100) 77.83 (58–100) 77.80 (58–100)
WJ Passage Comprehension 72.53 (21–93) 72.59 (21–93) 72.09 (21–93)
TOWRE Sight Word Efficiency 70.81 (55–90) 70.81 (55–90) 70.77 (55–90)
TOWRE Phonemic Decoding Efficiency 69.45 (55–100) 69.51 (55–100) 69.74 (55–100)
GORT Fluency 1.18 (1–8) 1.17 (1–8) 1.14 (1–3)
GORT Comprehension 2.56 (1–20) 2.61 (1–20) 2.56 (1–7)

Note. All reported scores are standard scores except for the CTOPP Elision, CTOPP Blending, CTOPP Rapid Letter Naming, GORT Fluency, and GORT Comprehension subtests. These scores are scaled scores with a M = 10 and a SD = 3. Additionally, the norms used to compute the standard/scale scores for the Peabody Individual Achievement Test, TOWRE Sight Word Efficiency, TOWRE Phonemic Decoding, CTOPP Elision, CTOPP Blending, CTOPP Rapid Letter Naming, GORT Fluency, and GORT Comprehension do not include the age ranges of our participants. These scores, therefore, were computed with the following ages (as appropriate): PIAT-22 years; TOWRE- 24 years; CTOPP-24 years; GORT-18 years, which were the oldest ages in which these tests had normative data available.

*

277 = the number of participants who attended through midpoint assessment; 256 = the number of participants who received posttest assessments, 198=the number of participants who met our minimal attendance requirement and therefore included in this data analysis.