Table 2.
Summary of Logistic Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting the Occurrence of Sexual Intercourse in the First Month of Young Women’s Premarital Relationships, for Relationships Beginning 10 (N = 551) and 5 (N = 362) Years before the Survey
Relationships in last 10 years | Relationships in last 5 years | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
OR | RSE | OR | RSE | OR | RSE | OR | RSE | |
Material transfers in relationship | ||||||||
Received money-gifts-assistance | 2.11** | 0.51 | 1.93** | 0.47 | 2.61** | 0.89 | 2.45** | 0.84 |
Gave money-gifts-assistance to partner | 1.30 | 0.36 | 1.20 | 0.34 | 1.49 | 0.46 | 1.41 | 0.44 |
Net amount receiveda | 1.12† | 0.07 | 1.12* | 0.06 | 1.15 | 0.13 | 1.14 | 0.12 |
In relationship for money-gifts-assistance | 1.77* | 0.45 | 1.89* | 0.50 | 2.53** | 0.90 | 2.48* | 0.90 |
Individual economic resources | ||||||||
Earned income | 0.83 | 0.26 | 0.86 | 0.27 | 0.62 | 0.25 | 0.63 | 0.25 |
Amount of incomea | 0.87* | 0.06 | 0.86* | 0.06 | 0.88† | 0.06 | 0.87* | 0.06 |
Had another partner | 1.20 | 0.33 | 1.34 | 0.37 | 1.10 | 0.40 | 1.18 | 0.42 |
Net amount received from other partnersa | 1.00 | 0.09 | 1.01 | 0.10 | 1.01 | 0.09 | 1.02 | 0.09 |
Respondent other characteristics | ||||||||
Age | 1.10† | 0.06 | 1.09 | 0.06 | 1.07 | 0.08 | 1.06 | 0.08 |
Level of educationb | ||||||||
Secondary or higher | 0.26*** | 0.08 | 0.27*** | 0.09 | 0.35** | 0.14 | 0.35* | 0.15 |
Household economic status indexc | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.19 |
Partner characteristics | ||||||||
Age | 1.02 | 0.03 | 1.02 | 0.03 | 1.03 | 0.04 | 1.03 | 0.04 |
Level of educationb | ||||||||
Secondary | 1.73† | 0.49 | 1.68† | 0.48 | 1.25 | 0.50 | 1.20 | 0.50 |
Post-secondary | 1.98† | 0.81 | 1.90 | 0.78 | 1.64 | 0.85 | 1.56 | 0.83 |
High economic statusd | 1.05 | 0.28 | 1.11 | 0.30 | 1.15 | 0.40 | 1.25 | 0.42 |
Had another partner(s) | 1.94* | 0.50 | 1.91* | 0.52 | 1.80 | 0.68 | 1.84 | 0.72 |
Commitment within relationship | ||||||||
Relationship typee | ||||||||
Fiancé/serious | — | 1.72 | 0.59 | — | 1.72 | 0.69 | ||
Dating | — | 1.15 | 0.31 | — | 1.29 | 0.47 | ||
In relationship for love | — | 1.29 | 0.29 | — | 1.03 | 0.32 | ||
Aspires to marry partner | — | 1.37 | 0.34 | — | 1.09 | 0.37 | ||
χ2 | 66.19 | 71.88 | 56.01 | 58.95 | ||||
df | 16 | 20 | 16 | 20 |
Notes: OR = odds ratio. RSE = robust standard error. Ksh denotes Kenyan shillings. At the time of survey, 70 Ksh corresponded to 1 U.S. dollar.
Per 1000 Ksh.
Reference is none/primary.
Standardized index of 14 household items (range = −0.2–0.13).
Reference is medium/low.
Reference is casual/other.
p< .10.
p< .05.
p< .01.
p < .001.