Table 1. Baseline characteristics of 5376 adults by retroviral status, Caió, 1989-2009.
HTLV-1 negative | HTLV-1 positive | |||||||
HIV nega | HIV-1 pos | HIV-2 pos | HIV-1/2 posb | HIV neg | HIV-2 pos | HIV-1 or HIV-1/2 posc | Total | |
Total number | 4,797 | 55 | 235 | 14 | 200 | 61 | 14 | 5376 |
Number female (%) | 2,801 (58) | 30 (55) | 151 (64) | 12 (86)* | 131 (66)* | 54 (89)* | 12 (86)* | 3191 (59) |
Median age (IQR) | 25 (20–43) | 31 (25–42) | 44 (34–58)* | 47 (35–60)* | 42 (23–64)* | 59 (45–67)* | 48 (42–54)* | 27 (20–47) |
Age group (%) | ||||||||
15–29 | 2,878 (60) | 26 (47)* | 40 (17)* | 1 (7)* | 74 (37)* | 3 (5)* | – | 3,022 (56) |
30–44 | 785 (16) | 20 (36)* | 80 (34)* | 6 (43)* | 37 (19)* | 12 (20)* | 5 (36)* | 945 (18) |
45–59 | 502 (10) | 5 (9)* | 64 (27)* | 3 (21)* | 29 (15)* | 17 (28)* | 8 (57)* | 628 (12) |
60-max | 632 (13) | 4 (7)* | 51 (22)* | 4 (29)* | 60 (30)* | 29 (48)* | 1 (7)* | 781 (15) |
Ethnic group Manjako (%) | 4,561 (95) | 49 (89) | 218 (93) | 12 (86) | 189 (95) | 60 (98) | 14 (100) | 5103 (95) |
Central zone of living (%) | 3,156 (66) | 43 (78)* | 184 (79)* | 10 (71) | 144 (73) | 50 (82)* | 10 (71) | 3597 (67) |
Marital status (%) | ||||||||
Single | 2,223 (46) | 18 (33)* | 36 (15)* | 1 (7)* | 62 (31)* | 4 (7)* | 2 (14)* | 2346 (44) |
Married | 2,314 (48) | 29 (53)* | 186 (71)* | 5 (36)* | 102 (51)* | 30 (49)* | 9 (64)* | 2657 (49) |
Widowed | 201 (4) | 6 (11)* | 21 (9)* | 6 (43)* | 28 (14)* | 21 (34)* | 2 (14)* | 285 (5) |
Divorced | 54 (1) | 2 (4)* | 10 (4)* | 1 (7)* | 8 (4)* | 6 (10)* | 1 (7)* | 82 (2) |
Number with only baseline sample (%) d | 2601 (54) | 34 (62) | 87 (37)* | 9 (64)* | 111 (56) | 26 (43) | 9 (64) | 2877 (54) |
Neg, negative; pos, positive; IQR, interquartile range; ranksum test for age, chi square for proportions of infected versus HIV and HTLV-1 uninfected individuals (
* = significant at 5% level).
5 subjects had missing data for marital status.
1 subject had missing data for marital status.
5 subjects were HTLV-1/HIV-1 infected and 9 were HTLV-1/HIV-1/2 infected.
please see Van Tienen et al. JAIDS 2010 for the differences between subjects with and without a follow-up sample.