Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct 25;20(12):2496–2506. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0635

Table 1.

Comparisons of the ROC-AUCs for CA125 and HE4 across the groups enrolled in this study

CA125 ROC-AUC (95% CI) HE4 ROC-AUC (95% CI) p-value
Post-menopause EOC vs HC 0.9940 (0.9866–1.0000) 0.9576 (0.9279–0.9873) 0.0147
EOC vs Cysts 0.9602 (0.9353–0.9852) 0.9400 (0.9039–0.97599) 0.2439
Cysts vs HC 0.6671 (0.5898–0.7444) 0.5856 (0.5055–0.6656) 0.1420
Pre-menopause EOC vs HC 0.9773 (0.9457–1.0000) 0.9177 (0.8279–1.0000) 0.1233
EOC vs Cysts 0.9549 (0.9053–1.0000) 0.9016 (0.8068–0.9965) 0.1867
EOC vs End 0.8473 (0.7397–0.9549) 0.8925 (0.7907–0.9944) 0.3211
Cysts vs HC 0.5960 (0.4644–0.7275) 0.5744 (0.4390–0.7097) 0.8280
End vs HC 0.8982 (0.8183–0.9781) 0.6369 (0.5055–0.7682) 0.0011
End vs Cysts 0.8361 (0.7307–0.9416) 0.5471 (0.4075–0.6867) 0.0019

ROC-AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; HE4, human epididymis protein 4; CI, confidence interval; HC, healthy controls; Cysts, patients with ovarian benign cysts; End, patients with endometriosis; EOC, patients with epithelial ovarian cancer