Table 7.
Model | Variable | B | SE | β | ΔR2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis 1: Predicting SB lookinga | |||||
1 | V1CDI | .001 | .000 | .61* | .313* |
2 | V1CDI | .001 | .000 | .66* | |
V1NBlatencyb | 028 | .048 | .15 | .00+ | |
3 | V1CDI | .001 | .000 | .74* | |
V1NBlatencyb | 070 | .041 | .39 | ||
V1WOlatencyc | −.164 | .061 | −.56* | .24* | |
Analysis 2: Predicting SB lookinga | |||||
1 | V1CDI | .001 | .000 | .61* | .313* |
2 | V1CDI | .001 | .000 | .61* | |
V1NBlookingd | .04 | .403 | .064 | .00+ | |
3 | V1CDI | .001 | .000 | .51* | |
V1NBlookingd | .440 | .323 | .27 | ||
V1WOlookinge | −1.731 | .583 | −.61* | .266* |
Percent looking to the match for Test trials minus Baseline trials, entire trial, Syntactic Bootstrapping
Latency to the match for the Test trials, Noun Bias
Latency to the match for the Test Trials, Word Order
Percent looking to the match for Test trials minus Baseline trials, entire trial, Noun Bias
Percent looking to the match for Test trials minus Baseline trials, entire trial, Word order.
p < .10,
p < .05