Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2011 Oct 19;4(6):422–437. doi: 10.1002/aur.223

Table 7.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Syntactic Bootstrapping, ASD group (N = 17)

Model Variable B SE β ΔR2
Analysis 1: Predicting SB lookinga
1 V1CDI .001 .000 .61* .313*
2 V1CDI .001 .000 .66*
V1NBlatencyb 028 .048 .15 .00+
3 V1CDI .001 .000 .74*
V1NBlatencyb 070 .041 .39
V1WOlatencyc −.164 .061 −.56* .24*
Analysis 2: Predicting SB lookinga
1 V1CDI .001 .000 .61* .313*
2 V1CDI .001 .000 .61*
V1NBlookingd .04 .403 .064 .00+
3 V1CDI .001 .000 .51*
V1NBlookingd .440 .323 .27
V1WOlookinge −1.731 .583 −.61* .266*
a

Percent looking to the match for Test trials minus Baseline trials, entire trial, Syntactic Bootstrapping

b

Latency to the match for the Test trials, Noun Bias

c

Latency to the match for the Test Trials, Word Order

d

Percent looking to the match for Test trials minus Baseline trials, entire trial, Noun Bias

e

Percent looking to the match for Test trials minus Baseline trials, entire trial, Word order.

+

p < .10,

*

p < .05