Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Allergy. 2011 Sep 27;67(1):131–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02721.x

Table 2.

School Personnel Reports of School Environments Regarding Prevention and Management of Anaphylaxis

Legislated (n = 710) Non-Legislated (n = 853) P-value

School has written policy for prevention and management of anaphylaxis 54.6% 47.1% 0.003

Parents required to complete emergency management form for child 57.3% 57.1% 0.967

Emergency Management Form Comprehensiveness (n=407) (n=487)
 Mean score (theoretical score range: 0 – 4) 1.9 ± 1.8 2.2 ± 1.8 0.04
 Frequency of elements on emergency form:
 • List of child’s allergies 53.6% 61.2%
 • Location of auto-injector 43.7% 49.3%
 • Emergency protocol 45.0% 52.0%
 • Photo of child 47.3% 55.6%

Provided with personal copy of emergency form 38.2% 43.4% 0.05

Trained to administer EpiPen 95.1% 81.1% < 0.001

EpiPen Technique (n = 418) (n = 439)
 Mean score (theoretical score range: 0 – 4) 3.0 ± 1.2 2.5 ± 1.2 < 0.001

A lack of school awareness and training related to allergies placed a student at risk 0.70% 1.1% 0.28

School awareness and training related to allergies helped a student during a reaction 10.9% 9.6% 0.07