. 2011 Jul 6;470(1):61–68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1961-4

Table 5.

Results of the different series comparing fixed- and mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty in the literature

Authors	Date of publication	Number of implants (fixed/mobile)	Methods of evaluation	Clinical results Fixed/mobile	Followup mean years (minimum to maximum)	Survivorship (number of revisions)
Emerson et al. [11]	2002	51	Clinic and radiographic	KSKS = 89/92 pts	6.1	FB: 92% at 11 years
Emerson et al. [11]	2002	50	Clinic and radiographic	KSFS = 74/82 pts	(6 months to 13 years)	MB: 92% at 11 years
Confalonieri et al. [9]	2004	20	Clinic and radiographic	KSKS = 87/88 pts	5.7 years	O revision
Confalonieri et al. [9]	2004	19	Clinic and radiographic	KSFS = 76/77 pts	NA	O revision
Li et al. [25]	2006	28	Clinic	KSKS = 91/89 pts		FB: 0 revision
		28	Kinematics	KSFS = 84/85 pts		FB: 0 revision
		28	radiographic		31.9 months	MB: 2 revisions
		28	radiographic		7–70 months	MB: 2 revisions
Whittaker et al. [41]	2010	150	Clinic and radiographic	KSS = 169/173 pts	FB: 8.1 (1–17.8)	FB: 96% at 5 years
Whittaker et al. [41]	2010	79	Clinic and radiographic	KSS = 169/173 pts	MB: 3.6 (1–11.3)	MB: 89% at 5 years
Parratte et al. (current study)	2011	79	Clinic and radiographic	KSKS = 82/81 pts	17.2 years	FB: 83% at 20 years
Parratte et al. (current study)	2011	77	Clinic and radiographic	KSFS = 88/89 pts	15–21.2 years	MB: 80% at 20 years

UKA = unicompartmental arthroplasty; KSS = Knee Society score; KSKS = Knee Society Knee score; KSFS = Knee Society Function score; pts = points; NA = not applicable; FB = fixed-bearing; MB = mobile-bearing.