Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 20;1:97. doi: 10.1038/srep00097

Figure 4. Comparison of dimer counts obtained from regression estimates vs. simulations.

Figure 4

A data point on the diagonal line would indicate perfect agreement between the two values while points above the line show overestimates of simulation values and points below the line underestimates. (a) Keq(α,C) in 100nm × 100nm. (b) Keq(α,C) in 200nm × 200nm. (c) Keq(α,C) in 400nm × 400nm. (d) Keq(β,C) in 100nm × 100nm. (e) Keq(β,C) in 200nm × 200nm. (f) Keq(β,C) in 400nm × 400nm. (g) Keq(α,β,C) in 100nm × 100nm. (h) Keq(α,β,C) in 200nm × 200nm. (i) Keq(α,β,C) in 400nm × 400nm. The concentration of reactants is fixed at 0.1 and the concentration of inert crowding agents is randomly selected from 0.0 to 0.3. The other parameters are uniformly randomly selected, with B from 0.1–0.9, M from 0.6–1.4ns, D from 1.95–21.95 × 10−11m2s−1, α from 1.4 – 3.2, and β from 0.4 – 1.6.