Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 4;19(1):102–110. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000059

Table 2.

Comparison of relative relationship scores between the theoretical method and empirical screening data by generations and family members

Generation Number of other family members Theoretical method Empirical screening data Capture rate (B/A)
Types of combination (A) Range Mean (SD) Median Types of combination (B) Range Mean (SD) Median
First* 1 5 (1–7) 3.8 (2.6) 3.0 (see second generation)
2 14 (3–14) 8.0 (3.4) 8.0 5 (8–14) 9.6 (2.6) 8.0 35.7%
3 30 (5–21) 12.3 (4.3) 12.0 10 (11–21) 16.2 (2.5) 15.0 33.3%
4 55 (7–28) 16.7 (5.2) 17.0 12 (14–28) 22.7 (2.7) 22.0 21.8%
5 91 (9–35) 21.2 (6.1) 21.0 8 (22–35) 30.0 (2.8) 29.0 8.8%
6 140 (11–42) 25.6 (7.0) 25.5 9 (24–42) 35.2 (5.7) 36.0 6.4%
7 204 (13–49) 30.1 (7.9) 30.0 6 (33–49) 44.2 (5.5) 44.0 2.9%
8 285 (13–49) 28.0 (8.4) 28.0 2 (34–42) 38.0 (5.7) 38.0 0.7%
Second 1 4 (1–8) 5.5 (3.1) 6.5 4 (1–8) 3.0 (2.8) 1.0 100.0%
2 9 (7–16) 12.0 (3.2) 13.0 6 (7–16) 11.3 (3.4) 12.0 66.7%
3 15 (13–23) 18.4 (3.2) 19.0 12 (13–23) 17.6 (3.4) 18.0 80.0%
4 21 (19–30) 24.9 (3.3) 25.0 17 (19–30) 23.5 (3.2) 24.0 81.0%
5 27 (25–37) 31.3 (3.4) 31.0 20 (25–35) 29.5 (3.0) 29.0 74.1%
6 33 (31–44) 37.8 (3.5) 38.0 21 (31–43) 35.0 (2.8) 35.0 63.6%
7 39 (37–51) 44.3 (3.6) 44.0 19 (37–48) 41.9 (2.6) 42.0 48.7%
8 45 (37–50) 43.2 (3.6) 43.0 7 (43–51) 46.3 (2.6) 45.5 15.6%
9 51 (37–49) 42.5 (3.6) 42.0 4 (51–58) 53.8 (3.1) 53.0 7.8%
Third 1 5 (1–8) 4.8 (2.6) 5.0
2 14 (5–16) 10.1 (3.1) 10.0 2 (12–13) 12.5 (0.5) 12.0 14.3%
3 27 (9–22) 15.5 (3.4) 16.0 8 (13–21) 19.9 (1.7) 21.0 29.6%
4 40 (14–28) 21.1 (3.5) 21.0 9 (20–27) 26.1 (1.3) 27.0 22.5%
5 49 (19–34) 26.7 (3.6) 27.0 6 (26–33) 31.9 (1.7) 33.0 12.2%
6 51 (20–32) 25.5 (3.1) 25.0 2 (33–34) 33.8 (0.4) 34.0 3.9%
*

Parents (X8) not included.

Grandchildren not included.

Offspring not included.