Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2011 Dec 7;19(12):1807–1815. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.09.021

Table 1. Properties of phosphorylation sites on protein binding interfaces.

Abundance” row shows p-value of Fisher exact test of association between being phosphorylated and location on binding interface (compared to surface). Other rows present p-values calculated by Wilcoxon rank-sum test showing the difference between phosphosites and non-phosphosites on binding interfaces with respect to different properties. Significant p-values (after Holm-Bonferroni correction) showing enrichment of phosphosites with a given property are shown with asterisks. “Protomer ASA” is accessible surface area of a given protomer without binding partner; “ΔASA” is the difference in accessible surface area upon complex formation, “Hydrogen bonds” is the number of hydrogen bonds per site, “Residue contacts” is the number of residue-residue contacts per site, “Conservation” is evolutionary conservation of site. “ΔΔGala” is the difference in binding energy upon Ala substitution and “ΔΔGp” is the difference in binding energy upon attaching phosphate groups to phosphorylated sites on interfaces. Note that the p-values for ΔΔGp indicate whether the distribution is significantly shifted to positive values. See also Figure S1 and S2.

All All All Homooligomers
Hetero Homo Weak Strong Permanent
Abundance on
Interface
*1.5e-13 *7.4e-15 0.097 *8.2e-04 0.417 0.054
Structural
properties
Protomer ASA *2.2e-16 *2.2e-16 0.065 0.057 0.318 0.137
ΔASA *4.5e-08 *1.7e-09 0.482 0.609 0.361 0.050
Hydrogen bonds *5.9e-05 *5.3e-04 *0.043 *0.042 0.272 0.202
Residue contacts *2.8e-04 *1.1e-03 0.217 0.502 0.424 0.452
Energetic
properties
 ΔΔGala *1.8e-03 *2.7e-04 0.494 0.181 0.670 0.390
 ΔΔGp *2.2e-16 *1.3e-12 *1.3e-08 *2.8e-05 *1.1e-04 *1.6e-05
Evolutionary
conservation
*0.018 *0.016 0.296 0.558 0.113 0.654
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure