Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 1;41(1):126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.050

Table 2:

Demographic and operative data between types of RVOT repair

Group 1 Valve-sparing Group 2 Infundibulum-sparing Group 3 TAP p-value
Number patients 48 45 47 0.66
Median age (m) 7 6 7.5 0.21
Median SaO2 91%b 87% 85% 0.03
Previous shunt 10% 11% 34%c 0.004
Preop PV z-value −0.86 ± 1.15a −2.84 ± 0.75 −3.26 ± 0.95 <0.001
TAP length/BSA (mm cm”2) 13.2 ± 3.6 30.2 ± 8.1 d <0.001
Postop PV z-value 0.34 ± 0.94 0.0 ± 0.61 0.12 ± 0.84 0.13
Postop RV/LVP 0.65 ± 0.17a 0.74 ± 0.16 0.79 ± 0.16 <0.001

a p < 0.05 between group 1 and 2–3.

b p < 0.05 between group 1 and 3.

c p < 0.05 between group 3 and 1–2.

d p < 0.05 between group 2 and 3.