Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Nov;38(11):1030–1035. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318227a486

Table 2.

Accuracy of respondents’ reports of their partner’s age. Notes: Specificity = # of relations reported as age homogenous by the respondent/# of true age homogenous relationships; Sensitivity = # of relations reported as age disparate by the respondent/(# true number of age disparate relations.

Partner classified as more than 5 years older
All relations Consistent age reporters Age heaping
Estimate (n/N) 95% CI Estimate (n/N) 95% CI Estimate (n/N) 95% CI
Specificity
 All relations 89.0(299/336) 85.1–92.1 91.3(105/115) 84.6–95.7 89.0(194/218) 84.1–92.8
 Respondent < 25 years old 89.7(131/146) 83.6–94.1 88.9(48/54) 77.4–95.8 90.8(99/109) 83.8–95.5
 Respondent ≥ 25 years old 88.4(168/190) 83.0–92.6 93.4(57/61) 84.0–98.2 87.2(95/109) 79.4–92.8
Sensitivity
 All relations 24.3(43/177) 18.2–31.3 16.1(5/31) 5.5–33.7 22.1(23/104) 14.6–31.3
 Respondent < 25 years old 14.0(8/57) 6.3–25.8 --a --a 10.8(4/37) 3.0–25.4
 Respondent ≥ 25 years old 29.2(35/120) 21.2–38.2 --a --a 28.4(19/67) 18.0–40.7
Partner classified as more than 10 years older
Specificity
 All relations 98.3(453/461) 96.6–99.2 98.6(140/142) 95.0–99.8 99.0(284/287) 97.0–99.8
Sensitivity
 All relations 9.6(5/52) 3.2–21.0 --a --a 8.6(3/35) 1.9–23.0
a

The number of cases available for analysis was less than 20 and these cells were thus excluded from the analyses