Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 4;105(9):1288–1294. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.394

Table 1. Patients’ characteristics.

    FSS Radical surgery
 
  Total Group A Group B Group C P-value
Total 572 74 52 446  
           
Age <0.0001
 ⩽40 126 74 52 0  
 >40 446 0 0 446  
           
FIGO stage 0.0291
 IA 191 36 18 137  
 IB 7 1 0 6  
 IC 374 37 34 303  
 IC(r)*1 213 21 21 171  
 IC(non-r)*2 161 16 13 132  
           
Histological type 0.0002#1
 Serous 64 4 4 56  
 Mucinous 150 43 18 89  
 Clear-cell 212 13 17 182  
 Endometrioid 128 14 11 103  
 Others*3 18 0 2 16  
           
Grade 0.294#2
 G1/G2 323 57 33 233  
 G3 37 4 2 31  
 NC*4 212 13 17 182  
           
Comprehensive surgical staging surgery NA
 Yes 321 NC 24 297  
 No 177 NC 28 149  
 FSS 74 74 NC NC  
           
Preoperative CA125 value 0.0003
 ⩽35 IU ml–1 204 29 14 161  
 >35 IU ml–1 332 33 37 262  
 Unknown 36 12 1 23  
           
Peritoneal cytology 0.145
 Negative 407 58 35 314  
 Positive 165 16 17 132  
           
Platinum-based chemotherapy 0.266#3
 Taxane plus platinum 241 22 16 203  
 Conventional platinum-based 205 32 30 143  
 None 126 20 6 100  

Abbreviations: FIGO=International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; FSS=fertility-sparing surgery; NC=not classified; NA=not analysed; *1=intraoperative capsule rupture; *2=washing/ascites positive or preoperative capsule rupture; *3=mixed epithelial tumour and undifferentiated carcinoma; *4=grade of clear-cell pathology was not classified. P-values: comparison of groups A with groups B–C; #1=Clear-cell vs non clear-cell, #2=G1/G2 vs G3; #3=platinum-based chemotherapy, present vs absent.