Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 21;108(49):19546–19551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113050108

Table 2.

Quantitative data on subsistence economy collated for each population

Population Predominant subsistence economy Gathering Hunting Fishing Animal husbandry Agriculture Milking
Ibo Extensive agriculture 0–5% 0–5% 0–5% 6–15% 86–100% 1
Italians Intensive agriculture 0–5% 0–5% 16–25% 16–25% 56–65% 2
Japanese Intensive agriculture 0–5% 0–5% 6–15% 6–15% 76–85% 1
Chinese Intensive agriculture 0–5% 0–5% 6–15% 6–15% 76–85% 1
Mongolian Mostly pastoralism 0–5% 6–15% 0–5% 76–85% 6–15% 2
Hawikuh Intensive agriculture 26–35% 6–15% 6–15% 0–5% 46–55% 1
Biaka/Mbuti Mostly hunting 26–35% 66–75% 0–5% 0–5% 0–5% 1
San Mostly gathering 76–85% 16–25% 0–5% 0–5% 0–5% 1
Alaskan Mostly hunting 6–15% 66–75% 16–25% 0–5% 0–5% 1
Greenland Mostly fishing 6–15% 16–25% 66–75% 0–5% 0–5% 1
Australian Mostly gathering 56–65% 36–45% 0–5% 0–5% 0–5% 1

For each category of subsistence dependence, the following ordinal scale was used: 0 = 0–5%, 1 = 6–15%, 2 = 16–25%, 3 = 26–35%, 4 = 36–45%, 5 = 46–55%, 6 = 56–65%, 7 = 66–75%, 8 = 76–85%, 9 = 86–100%. The predominant subsistence economy assigned in the Ethnographic Atlas database was used to assign populations into two groups: agriculturalist/pastoralist and hunter/gatherer/fishers. For the milking variable, 0 = missing, 1 = little/none, 2 = more often than sporadically.