Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 1;28(12):1197–1203. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9627-4

Table 3.

Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of different AMH threshold values for prediction of OHSS

Cut-off value Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) PPV (95% CI)
2.29 ng/ml 100% (91.4–100) 52.3% (41.2–63.4) 100 (92–100) 50.6 (39.2–62)
2.53 ng/ml 92.6% (80.1–98.5) 57.1% (45.9–67.9) 94.1 (83.6–98.8) 51.4 (39.3–63.3)
3.3 ng/ml 90% (0.77–0.97) 71% (0.61–0.81) 94 (0.84–0.98) 61 (0.47–0.73)
3.88 ng/ml 75.6% (59.7–87.6) 78.5% (68.3–86.8) 86.8 (77.1–93.5) 63.3 (48.3–76.6)
4.3 ng/ml 75.6% (59.7–87.6) 82.1% (72.3–89.6) 87.3 (77.9–93.8) 67.4 (52–80.5)
5.07 ng/ml 56.1% (39.7–71.5) 88.1% (79.2–94.1) 80.4 (70.9–88.0) 69.7 (51.3–84.4)
10.2 ng/ml 17% (7.2–32.1) 100% (95.7–100) 71.2 (62.1–79.2) 100 (59.0–100)

AMH antimullerian hormone; NPV negative predictive value; PPV positive predictive value; OHSS ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome