Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Nov 30;133(50):20611–20622. doi: 10.1021/ja209244m

Table 5.

Effects of Reaction Concentration, Catalyst, Ligand, and Acid Loadings on the Allene Hydrocarbonation Reaction

graphic file with name nihms338081u5.jpg
entry Conc.a x y z % yieldb d.r.c % eed
1 0.1 M 2.5 7.5 10 94 13:1 84
2e 0.1 M 2.5 7.5 10 >99 4.5:1 52
3f 0.1 M 2.5 7.5 10 94 10:1 80
4 0.1 M 2.5 7.5 2.5 >99 11:1 82
5 0.1 M 2.5 7.5 5 97 13:1 84
6 0.1 M 2.5 7.5 50 61 (91) 5.8:1 60
7 0.1 M 2.5 7.5 100 55 (96) 3.5:1 −6
8 0.1 M 0.5 1.5 1 94 11:1 82
9 0.1 M 5 15 10 >99 13:1 80
10 0.2 M 2.5 7.5 5 >99 10:1 74
11 0.5 M 2.5 7.5 5 96 6.5:1 64
12 0.05 M 2.5 7.5 5 >99 14:1 89
13 0.01 M 2.5 7.5 5 90 19:1 93
14 0.1 M 2.5 6.0 5 95 14:1 87
15 0.1 M 2.5 5.5 5 97 14:1 86
16g 0.1 M 2.5 5.5 5 95 11:1 80
17h 0.1 M 2.5 5.5 5 >99 4.6:1 53
a

With respect to 10.

b

Determined by 1H NMR with respect to mesitylene as the internal standard; number in parantheses refers to yield based on unreacted 10.

c

Determined by 1H NMR analysis of the unpurified reaction mixture.

d

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.

e

20 mol% tetrabutylammonium difluorotriphenylsilicate (TBAT) employed.

f

20 mol% (n-hexyl)4 NBr employed.

g

Reaction performed at 4 °C.

h

Reaction performed at −20 °C.