Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Signal. 2011 Dec 6;4(202):ra84. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002058

Table 1.

Comparison of PKCθ−/−, PKCη−/−, and DKO mice. IS, immunological synapse.

PKCθ KO PKCη KO# DKO#
Thymocytes
Positive selection Mildly impaired# Normal Strongly impaired
Negative selection Normal Normal ND
Mature T cells
CD4:CD8 T cell ratio Lower than WT Higher than WT Equal to WT
Proliferation
 to αCD3 in vitro Severely impaired Mildly impaired ≈ PKCθ KO
 to PMA/iono Normal Normal ND
 to antigen in vivo Normal or Impaired Impaired ND
 to antigen in vitro Impaired Impaired ND
Homeostatic prolif.
 Non-Tg CD8 Normal CD8 impaired Strongly impaired
 OT-I Tg Normal# Impaired Strongly impaired
Signaling events
Ca2+ flux Impaired Impaired ND
NF-κB translocation Impaired Impaired ND
Recruitment to IS* Recruited, central region Recruited, diffuse
pattern
*

Not based on knockout mice.

#

Based on data obtained from this study. ND: not determined.