Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2011 Nov 9;80(1):246–260. doi: 10.1002/prot.23199

Table 4.

The most native-like (three lowest RMSD) predicted loop configurations of GART, CYP119, and enolase. The ranked position of each loop configuration is shown after scoring with the DFIRE, single snapshot MM/GBSA, trajectory MM/GBSA, and the Optimized MM/GBSA-dsr scoring functions (co-crystallized ligand added).

With co-crystallized ligand
Protein System Backbone RMSDa Heavy Atom RMSDa DFIRE Rankingb Snapshot MM/GBSAc Traj MM/GBSAd Optimized MM/GBSA-dsre
GART 0.57 1.15 31 5 10 40
0.74 1.30 19 26 30 44
1.02 1.55 45 36 23 47
CYP119 1.61 2.92 50 2 12 74
1.79 2.76 54 8 14 39
1.80 2.99 81 29 25 62
Enolase 1.43 1.71 81 62 66 10
1.70 2.31 12 59 41 32
1.75 2.96 39 29 19 12
a

RMSD in Å to known X-ray loop configuration

b

DFIRE scoring function was used to rank predicted loop configurations

c

a single minimized structure was used to calculate a MM/GBSA score and rank loop configurations

d

20 snapshots from an MD trajectory were used to calculate a MM/GBSA score and rank loop configurations

e

Optimized MM/GBSA-dsr scoring function used to score and rank loop configurations