Figure 4.
(A) Cumulative group distributions of RTs from the CFS and the control condition in Experiment 1. We obtained the RTs corresponding to the 5th to 95th percentiles at 5% intervals from each subject’s individual cumulative RT distributions. These percentile estimates were then averaged across subjects to create group average RT distributions (Thomas and Ross, 1980; Mordkoff and Yantis, 1991). In this and all further graphs depicting cumulative group distributions, the shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals generated by bootstrapping (Mack et al., 2009). (B,C) Size of the FIE as a function of percentiles, plotted separately for the (B) CFS and the (C) control condition. Within each condition, we first created separate group average RT distributions for trials with upright and inverted faces and then computed the FIE (RT inverted–RT upright) at each percentile. In this and all further graphs depicting the FIE at separate percentiles, the shaded areas depict the 95% confidence intervals for the FIE at each percentile.
