Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Oct;9(10):1315–1330. doi: 10.1586/erc.11.120

Table 2.

Overview of carotid endarterectomy versus medical therapy trials.

Trial (year) Stenosis (%) Treatment Results
Symptomatic patients
NASCET (1991) 70–99 CEA + medical therapy versus medical therapy 65% lower rate of ipsilateral cerebral events with CEA
ECST (1991) 70–99 CEA + medical therapy versus medical therapy Incidence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke 2.8 versus 16.8% with aspirin alone
VA (1991) 50–99 CEA + medical therapy versus medical therapy Death or stroke 7.7% with CEA versus 19.4% with medical therapy
Asymptomatic patients
ACAS (1995) 60–99 CEA + medical therapy versus medical therapy Relative risk reduction of 53% with CEA
ACST (2004) 60–99 CEA + medical therapy versus medical therapy 5-year stroke risk 6.4% with CEA versus 11.8% with medical management
VA (1993) 50–99 CEA + medical therapy versus medical therapy 61% lower risk of TIA or stroke with CEA

ACAS: Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerotic Study; ACST: Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial; CEA: Carotid endarterectomy; ECST: European Carotid Surgery Trial; NASCET: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial; TIA: Transient ischemic attack; VA: The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.

Data taken from [68-70,82,89,90].