Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Oral Dis. 2011 Aug 29;18(1):74–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01847.x

Table 1.

Distribution of the study outcome, explanatory and descriptive variables

Variable Complete
data
sample
% or
Mean
(SD)
[Range]
Outcome Measuresa

Depression/anxiety risk (yes versus no; %) 104 8.7
Inattention/hyperactivity risk (yes versus no; %) 104 13.5
Aggressive/oppositional risk (yes versus no; %) 104 12.5
Somatic symptom risk (yes versus no; %) 104 13.5
Depression/anxiety T-score 104 52.7
(5.1)
[50–73]
Inattention/hyperactivity T-score 104 54.4
(7.2)
[50–83]
Aggressive/oppositional T-score 104 53.5
(6.4)
[50–79]
Somatic symptom T-score 104 54.3
(6.5)
[50–74]

Explanatory variables

Team care use (yes versus no; %) 103 77.7
Number of cleft surgeries 102 2.2
(1.4)
[1–7]
SES indexb 96 −0.01
(1.2)
[−3.0–1.9]
Child’s age (years) 104 6.5
(3.1)
[2–12]
Cleft palate only (yes versus no; %) 104 24.0%
Cleft lip only (yes versus no; %) 104 27.9%
Cleft lip with cleft palate (yes versus no; %) 104 48.1%
Child not very satisfied with own facial appearance (yes versus no; %) 93 33.3%
Child needs speech therapy (yes versus no; %) 104 38.5%

Additional descriptive variables

Child’s race reported as White (yes versus no; %) 104 95.2%
Maternal age (years) 104 35.4
(7.0)
Child is 2–5 years old (yes versus no; %) 104 56.7%
Child is 6–12 years old (yes versus no; %) 104 43.3%

Note: Complete data sample represents the number of children with complete data for the variables.

a

The binary behavior indicators (yes/no) are based on a T-score of 63 or higher (at/above 90th percentile for normative samples) within each domain.

b

The SES index is based on the first component scoring coefficients from a principal component analysis of maternal education, total household income, and child’s health insurance status/type. The index is estimated for cases with complete data on all these characteristics and on behavioral outcomes.