Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 29;10(2):1062–1092. doi: 10.3390/s100201062

Table 4.

Tests of the capability of the AromaScan A32S e-nose to identify 24 wood decay fungi in pure agar culture using conductive polymer analysis with recognition files constructed from a fungus-specific reference library.

Decay fungi unknowns N= Correctly identified1 Incorrectly identified2 Indeterminate, not identified3 Mean % aroma class match4
Amylostereum areolatum 2 2 0 0 73.8
Armillaria gallica 1 1 0 0 84.5
Armillaria mellea 2 2 0 0 91.9
Armillaria ostoyae 1 1 0 0 66.9
Armillaria tabescens 1 1 0 0 75.8
Cerrena unicolor 2 2 0 0 73.4
Daedalea quercina 1 1 0 0 71.5
Daldinia concentrica 4 4 0 0 85.3
Fomitopsis officinalis 1 1 0 0 67.1
Ganoderma lucidum 4 4 0 0 91.0
Gloeophyllum sepiarium 1 1 0 0 82.4
Hericium erinaceus 3 3 0 0 73.1
Heterobasidion annosum 1 1 0 0 77.9
Inonotus dryadeus 1 0 0 1 Unk
Laetiporus sulphureus 1 1 0 0 75.0
Oxyporus latemarginatus 5 5 0 0 76.2
Phanerochaete gigantea 1 1 0 0 100.0
Phellinus pini 2 0 0 2 Unk
Pleurotus ostreatus 1 1 0 0 64.5
Postia caesia 1 1 0 0 73.4
Spongipellis pachyodon 2 2 0 0 86.1
Stereum hirsutum 2 2 0 0 63.0
Wolfiporia cocos 1 1 0 0 66.0
Xylaria polymorpha 3 3 0 0 69.5
Totals 44 41 (93.2%) 0 3 (6.8%)
1

Number of unknown wood decay fungi samples correctly identified in pure 4.5% MA cultures.

2

Number of unknown wood decay fungi samples identified to an incorrect aroma class.

3

Number of unknown wood decay fungi samples not identified to an aroma class due to <70% ownership in any one aroma class.

4

Mean percentage match of unknown wood decay fungi samples to the correct aroma class identity. Unk = unknown, i.e., sampled was not identified.