Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 1;10(2):1154–1175. doi: 10.3390/s100201154

Table 1.

State of the art of human motor activity classification systems.

Reference Sensors Features Classifiers Activity Subjects Accuracy [%]
[38] 1 tri-axis accelerometer (3D acc) Raw data
Delta coefficients
DC component
GMM 8 6 91.3
[39] 1 bi-axis accelerometer (2D acc) Wavelet coefficients k-NN 5 6 86.6
[40] 1 3D acc Standard deviation
Energy distribution
DC component
Correlation coefficients
Naive Bayesian
k-NN
SVM
Binary decision
8 NA 46.3–99.3
[32] 5 2D acc Standard deviation
Energy distribution
DC component
Entropy
Correlation coefficients
Naive Bayesian
k-NN
Binary decision
20 20 84
[34] 2 3D acc Wavelet coefficients ANN 4 6 83–90
[41] 1 2D acc RMS velocity ANN 6 10 95
[33] 1 2D acc
Ambient sensors
Standard deviation
FFT coefficients Derivative
ANN
Markov chains
7 NA 42–96
[42] 1 3D acc Wavelet coefficients
Fractal dimension
Threshold-based 3 23 p < 0.01
[43] 1 3D acc Wavelet coefficients Threshold-based 3 20 98.8
[44] 1 2D acc 1 gyro Wavelet coefficients Threshold-based 5 44 > 90
[35] 1 3D acc FFT Threshold-based 9 12 95.1
[45] 1 2D acc
1 gyro
1 compass
Raw data
Standard deviation
Derivative
Threshold-based 5 8 92.9–95.9
[23] 2 uni-axis acc (1D acc) Median
Absolute deviation
Threshold-based 4 5 89.3
[19] 4 1D acc
Heart and breath rate
FFT Template matching 9 24 95.8
[30] 3 1D acc DC component
Standard deviation
Signal morphology
Threshold-based
Template matching
6 10 80–97.5
[46] 5 1D acc
1 2D acc
Angular signal
Motility
FFT
Binary decision 23 NA 81–93
[47] 1 3D acc Magnitude area/vector
Tilt angle
FFT
Binary decision 10 6 90.8