Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 24;10(2):1399–1422. doi: 10.3390/s100201399

Table 3.

Comparison of the most commonly used sensors for quantification and monitoring of tremor *.

Assessment of kinematics** EMG Surface EMG (SEMG) Needle electrodes Fine-wire electrodes Long-term recordings Force transducers and force-feedback devices (haptic devices)
Accelerometer Gyroscope Video
Gravity effect influence yes no no no no
Accuracy of frequency information good good may be low good good
Signal-to-noise ratio low to high high variable high high
Electrical contacts with subjects no no no yes yes
Size small small relatively large small Large
Painful no no no yes (needle EMG) no
Cost cheap cheap cheap to expensive variable expensive
Easy to use yes yes yes variable relatively difficult
Data processing required yes yes yes yes yes
Measurement of tremor amplitude calculation from time/acceleration measurement of inertial angular rate from calibrated video frames no from force/mass or position encoder
*

Emerging sensors include wearable textiles with integrated sensors, sensors based on the fusion approach and hybrid sensors.

**

Includes also flexible angular sensors/goniometers and laser-based devices.