Table 3.
Comparison of the most commonly used sensors for quantification and monitoring of tremor *.
| Assessment of kinematics** | EMG Surface EMG (SEMG) Needle electrodes Fine-wire electrodes Long-term recordings | Force transducers and force-feedback devices (haptic devices) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accelerometer | Gyroscope | Video | |||
| Gravity effect influence | yes | no | no | no | no |
| Accuracy of frequency information | good | good | may be low | good | good |
| Signal-to-noise ratio | low to high | high | variable | high | high |
| Electrical contacts with subjects | no | no | no | yes | yes |
| Size | small | small | relatively large | small | Large |
| Painful | no | no | no | yes (needle EMG) | no |
| Cost | cheap | cheap | cheap to expensive | variable | expensive |
| Easy to use | yes | yes | yes | variable | relatively difficult |
| Data processing required | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Measurement of tremor amplitude | calculation from time/acceleration | measurement of inertial angular rate | from calibrated video frames | no | from force/mass or position encoder |
Emerging sensors include wearable textiles with integrated sensors, sensors based on the fusion approach and hybrid sensors.
Includes also flexible angular sensors/goniometers and laser-based devices.