Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2011 Jun;76(3):465–486. doi: 10.1177/0003122411409705

Table 6. Comparison of OLS and propensity score matching results estimating the effect of union transitions with age 40 self-assessed health among women who had a nonmarital first birth (imputed data).

Age 40 Self-Assessed Health

Total Sample Black Women

OLS Propensity Score Matching OLS Propensity Score Matching

ATT ATT
PANEL A

Union historya
 Married biological father and it endured .327 (.104)** .273 (.131)* .341 (.141)* .154 (.148)
Treatment observations --- 261 --- 150
Control observations --- 1,014 --- 649
Total n 1,275 1,275 799 799

PANEL B

Union historya
 Married new partner and it ended NA NA .318 (.148)* 120 (.206)
Treatment observations NA NA -- 90
Control observations -- 709
Total n 799 799

Notes:

*

p < .05;

**

p <.01;

***

p < .001 (two-tailed tests);

Variance of the MI estimator in parentheses;

ATT = average treatment effect for the treated;

a

Compared to continually never-married and unpartnered women.